Academic Senate
The University's principal academic body
About Academic SenateCommittees of Academic Senate
Assisting Academic Senate in its responsibilities
View our committeesDetails of the current projects of Academic Senate
View Academic Senate's priorities and projects — both current and historical.
The Academic Senate projects for 2021 were endorsed at the Academic Senate meeting of November 2020 (view Item 5.5 in Truth).
Information on current projects, as well as projects from previous years, can be viewed below.
2021 projects
The Academic Senate projects currently in progress are detailed below.
Project | Status |
|---|---|
Post-Implementation Review of Shared Academic Governance The shared model has been implemented in a pilot phase with faculty boards authorised as agents of Academic Senate until such time as Academic Senate conducts a post-implementation review and recommends more permanent delegations. This project will conduct the post-implementation review. | Continues in 2021 |
Post-Implementation Review of Support and Recognition for Students involved in Academic Governance The 2018–2020 cohort of student senators was the first cohort to have access to this suite of initiatives for the duration of their term. | Continues in 2021 |
Review of Indigenous Connected Curriculum | Commence in 2021 |
Review of Diversity and Inclusion on Academic Senate | Commence in early 2021 |
Operating Plan 2020–2024 — Academic Senate engagement with academic and other related matters This includes:
| Commence in early 2021 |
Review of University Medal Policy It will also review the recent nominations and recipients of the award to highlight disciplines where the opportunity to put students forward for this award is underutilised, in particular under the category of the postgraduate course/program (AQF level 9) — which can be shown to include a substantial piece of independent work. | Commence in early 2021 |
University projects — Academic Senate as a major stakeholder | Status |
|---|---|
Preparations for the TEQSA re-registration, including self-assessment and planning for standards relating to academic governance. | Work underway led by Executive Manager, DVC(A) |
Quality Assurance Framework (Academic Domain) | Work underway led by Executive Manager, DVC(A) |
Curriculum Architecture 2.0 | Work underway led by DVC(A) |
2020 projects
The Academic Senate projects that ran in 2020 are detailed below.
For more information see the minutes of the meetings held in 2020 or contact senate@mq.edu.au.
Project | Status |
|---|---|
Policy review schedule | Completed. Policies review/development table available on Policy Central. |
Recommendations from the post-implementation review of the Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) | On hold until release of TEQSA response to Noonan Review of the AQF. |
Review of General Coursework Rules for Practical, Clinical and Professional Courses | Completed. Presented at Council meeting in December 2020. |
Post-Implementation Review of Support and Recognition for Students involved in Academic Governance | Continues into 2021. |
External Review of Academic Senate | Completed. Also see response project, below. |
Composition of Academic Senate | Completed. Amendments to Senate Rules available on Calendar of governance, legislation and rules. |
Post-Implementation Review of Shared Academic Governance | Continues into 2021. |
Response to Recommendations from External Review of Academic Senate | Complete. Implementation plan approved by Academic Senate. |
University projects — Academic Senate as a major stakeholder | Status |
|---|---|
Preparations for the TEQSA re-registration, including self-assessment and planning for standards relating to Academic Governance. | Work continues in 2021, led by Executive Manager, DVC(A) |
Quality Assurance Framework (Academic Domain) | Work continues in 2021 led by Executive Manager, DVC(A) |
Curriculum Architecture 2.0 | Work continues in 2021, led by DVC(A) |
2019 projects
The Academic Senate projects that ran in 2019 are detailed below.
Project | Details |
|---|---|
Implementation of Shared Academic Governance This project of Academic Senate recognises the role of faculty boards and empowers them to have a greater level of autonomy over coursework curricula. The project will deliver a greater activation of faculty boards and senate committees through devolved decision-making, supported by threshold standards, robust frameworks and annual reporting cycles to be established by Academic Senate and the Academic Standards and Quality Committee. Phase 2B has:
A post-implementation review will review the project in quarter 1, 2020. See the Shared Academic Governance page for more information. | Leads: Contact: Status: |
Review of General Coursework Rules This project is reviewing the practical, clinical and professional program requirements outlined in the General Coursework Rules and recommend necessary amendments to reflect University policy. | Leads: Contact: Status: |
Macquarie University and Freedom of Speech This project will:
| Leads: Contact: Status: |
External Review of Academic Senate The Higher Education Framework Standard 6.1.3(d) requires the governing body to undertake ‘periodic’ (at least every seven years) independent reviews of the effectiveness of the governing body and academic governance processes. This project will facilitate an external review. See more information on the External Review of Academic Senate. | Leads: Contact: Status: |
Post-Implementation Review of Support and Recognition for Students involved in Academic Governance This is a post-implementation review of the 2017 Support and Recognition for Students involved in Academic Governance project. It will be led by the Student Senators. The project will review the support and recognition initiatives for effectiveness, and check for alignment with the themes and targets contained within Student Success Strategic Framework. | Leads: Contact: Status: |
Recommendations from the Post-implementation review of the Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) The AQF Second Edition was released in January 2013, and an Addendum for Masters Degrees was released in June 2014. From 1 January 2015 all new enrolments were required to be in qualifications that meet the requirements of the AQF Second Edition. In 2018, a desk audit was conducted to document, assess and report on the University’s response to the implementation of the new AQF. A project was scheduled for 2019 to respond to the recommendations from the desk audit. Following the announcement of a review by the Department of Education, this project was put on hold. The report was released in late October 2019. This project will commence when the report from the review has been endorsed by TEQSA. | Contact: Status:Continued into 2020 |
Supporting DVC (A) work in a review of the University approach to quality In 2018 an audit was conducted of quality assurance across the University. This included a benchmarking analysis of peer institutions to determine different approaches to academic quality assurance, and furthermore, to detail how higher education institutions address regulatory requirements. A report identified appropriate business owners for different review categories, allowing for the appropriate referral of both academic governance and management recommendations. This project will respond to the academic governance recommendations. | Leads: Contact: Status: |
2018 projects
The Academic Senate projects that ran in 2018 are detailed below.
Project | Leads | Contact | Status |
Purpose and Composition of Academic Senate | Working group chair: Professor Mariella Herberstein | Zoe Williams, Head of Governance Services | Complete |
Developing the Model for Shared Responsibility of Academic Governance | Steering group co-chairs: Professor Mariella Herberstein, Chair of Senate; Working group co-chairs: | Zoe Williams, Head of Governance Services | Phase 1: Complete. Principles for Delegated Authority approved by Academic Senate in November Phase 2A: Resources. This phase is a project of ASQC. Phase 2B: Cultural Change. |
Post-implementation review of the Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) | Working group chair: Professor Jim Denier | Paul Fairweather. Quality Assurance and Compliance Manager | Continuing in 2019 |
Post-implementation review of the Higher Education Standards Framework (HESF) | Working group chair: Professor Jacqueline Phillips, Deputy Chair of Academic Senate | Paul Fairweather. Quality Assurance and Compliance Manager | Continuing in 2019 |
External Review of Academic Senate | TBC | Zoe Williams, Head of Governance Services | Postponed to 2019 |
Curriculum Architecture | Professor Mariella Herberstein, Chair of Senate; Professor Kevin Jameson, DVC(A) | Zoe Williams, Head of Governance Services | Complete |
Policy Review | Working group chair: Professor Peter Radan | Ellen Carlson, Policy Manager. E: ellen.carlson@mq.edu.au | Ongoing |
2017 projects
The Academic Senate projects that ran in 2017 are detailed below.
Project | Details |
|---|---|
Developing the Model for Shared Responsibility of Academic Governance Deliver a greater activation of Faculty Board and Senate Committees through devolved decision-making, supported by threshold standards, robust frameworks and annual reporting cycles to be established by Academic Senate and the Academic Standards and Quality Committee. Position Academic Standards and Quality Committee as a higher-level body with oversight of quality and standards and oversight over non-award programs and University owned degrees. Clearly define the role of Academic Senate as the approval authority for policy on academic matters, vis-à-vis a consultative body for policy approval. | Sponsors: Co-chairs of working group: Contact: Status: |
Purpose and Composition of Academic Senate Alignment between Academic Senates purpose with a more mature shared responsibility model of academic governance. Create transparency regarding the role and function of the University’s Academic Senate. Provide clarity to all members of Academic Senate (elected, appointed or ex-officio) regarding their role on the University’s principal academic body. Improve communication pathways to and from Academic Senate and its members, and to increase engagement from within and out Academic Senate. | Sponsors: Chair of working group: Contact: Status: |
Partnership with and Recognition of Student Members Increase and support student partnership in decision making. Increase student engagement with the University’s academic governance structures. Provide support and incentives to students members. Identify training and development opportunities for student members; clarifying the roles and responsibilities of student members and that assist with communication with the student electorates and student participation programs within the Faculties during tenure. | Sponsors: Co-chairs of working group: Contact: Status: |
Establishing Principles for Program Review Establish a consistent institutional approach to Program Reviews. | Sponsors: Chair of working group: Contact: Status: |
Review of Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement Policy and Process Renew and refresh the approach to quality assurance to deliver a streamlined and consistent framework for managing academic and quality assurance matters. Identification of appropriate business owners for different review categories, allowing for the appropriate referral of both academic governance and management recommendations. | Sponsors: Chair of working group: Contact: Status: |
Academic Integrity In July Academic Senate established a Working Group to review the Academic Honesty Policy (now the Academic Integrity Policy) to ensure alignment with the Academic Integrity Values Statement and the Student Discipline Rule and Procedure. A draft Academic Integrity Policy and supporting Schedules The draft documents are available for comment: | Sponsors: Chair of steering committee: Contact: Status: |
Eligibility and Selection Criteria for the University Medal Confirm the specifications of those programs that qualify students for the University Medal. Produce clear and consistent eligibility and selection criteria for the prize of the University Medal. Establish a student-facing communication strategy informing the Macquarie community about the prize and its recipients | Sponsors: Chair of working group: Contact: Status: |
Policy Review Streamline and/or consolidate existing Academic, Learning and Teaching and Higher Degree Research Policy and Procedure. Identify the required realignment of the approval authority for policy documents following the review of the Delegations of Authority and the changes to the Executive organisational structure. Ensure that the need to review, identify risks or necessary rescindment of academic policy is triggered in an agile manner. Increase engagement with the documented standards for the development, approval, communication, implementation and review of policy documents (Policy Framework Policy and Procedure). | Sponsors: Chair of working group: Contact: Status: |