Rainbowfish raised in the wild braver than those bred in captivity, study shows
The boldest black-lined rainbowfish are those that are born in the wild. Those that analyze information with both sides of their brains are also more fearless, conclude Australian researchers in a study published this week in Springer’s journal Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
The preference to analyze and react to information with either the left or right hemisphere of the brain is called cerebral lateralization and is widespread among vertebrates. Lateralization is commonly seen in hand or turn preferences, for example, the majority of humans are right handed.
Macquarie’s Associate Professor Culum Brown and Dr Anne-Laurence Bibost first compared wild rainbowfish and captive rainbowfish. They then used a modified version of the mirror test to find out if a fish showed a lateral preference to view itself with either its left or right eye. Levels of boldness were tested by timing how long it took a fish to emerge from a safe hiding place.
Non-lateralized fish (those that used both eyes to view their mirror image and thus that did not analyze information in a specific brain hemisphere) were significantly bolder than both left- and right-lateralized fish. This suggests that fear is heightened when primarily processed by a single hemisphere, making lateralized fish less bold.
Previous studies have shown that complex tasks are more difficult to perform when information processing is shared between two hemispheres. It therefore boils down to a question of speed. A non-lateralized fish in a potentially life-threatening situation must first draw information from both hemispheres, compare and integrate it before it can make a decision. Strongly lateralized fish, on the other hand, act more quickly because they only draw on information from a single hemisphere.
If non-lateralized fish process fear-related stimuli comparatively slowly or inefficiently, it may be that the moderating effect of fear is somewhat lessened in comparison to strongly lateralized fish. The researchers think this may result in a reduced level of fear generally, or perhaps the decision to explore is already made before the moderating effect of fear comes into play. Either scenario would adequately explain their observation that non-lateralized fish are bolder than lateralized fish.
The researchers were not surprised that wild fish were significantly bolder than captive-reared fish, as previous work they had done showed that populations that are hunted by predators were braver than those from low-predation areas.
“The similarities between personality and laterality are certainly intriguing and hint at a single underlying mechanism,” says Brown. “We suggest that these aspects of personality traits are actually caused by variation in laterality in fishes and perhaps all vertebrates including humans.”
Reference: Brown, C. & Bibost, A-L. (2014). Laterality is linked to personality in the black-lined rainbowfish, Melanotaenia nigrans, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, DOI 10.1007/s00265-014-1712
The boldest black-lined rainbowfish are those that are born in the wild. Those that analyze information with both sides of their brains are also more fearless, conclude Australian researchers in a study published this week in Springer’s journal Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
The preference to analyze and react to information with either the left or right hemisphere of the brain is called cerebral lateralization and is widespread among vertebrates. Lateralization is commonly seen in hand or turn preferences, for example, the majority of humans are right handed.
Macquarie’s Associate Professor Culum Brown and Dr Anne-Laurence Bibost first compared wild rainbowfish and captive rainbowfish. They then used a modified version of the mirror test to find out if a fish showed a lateral preference to view itself with either its left or right eye. Levels of boldness were tested by timing how long it took a fish to emerge from a safe hiding place.
Non-lateralized fish (those that used both eyes to view their mirror image and thus that did not analyze information in a specific brain hemisphere) were significantly bolder than both left- and right-lateralized fish. This suggests that fear is heightened when primarily processed by a single hemisphere, making lateralized fish less bold.
Previous studies have shown that complex tasks are more difficult to perform when information processing is shared between two hemispheres. It therefore boils down to a question of speed. A non-lateralized fish in a potentially life-threatening situation must first draw information from both hemispheres, compare and integrate it before it can make a decision. Strongly lateralized fish, on the other hand, act more quickly because they only draw on information from a single hemisphere.
If non-lateralized fish process fear-related stimuli comparatively slowly or inefficiently, it may be that the moderating effect of fear is somewhat lessened in comparison to strongly lateralized fish. The researchers think this may result in a reduced level of fear generally, or perhaps the decision to explore is already made before the moderating effect of fear comes into play. Either scenario would adequately explain their observation that non-lateralized fish are bolder than lateralized fish.
The researchers were not surprised that wild fish were significantly bolder than captive-reared fish, as previous work they had done showed that populations that are hunted by predators were braver than those from low-predation areas.
“The similarities between personality and laterality are certainly intriguing and hint at a single underlying mechanism,” says Brown. “We suggest that these aspects of personality traits are actually caused by variation in laterality in fishes and perhaps all vertebrates including humans.”
Reference: Brown, C. & Bibost, A-L. (2014). Laterality is linked to personality in the black-lined rainbowfish, Melanotaenia nigrans, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, DOI 10.1007/s00265-014-1712
